New Delhi: The Delhi High Court On Wednesday, there is a lot of public interest litigation (pills) who want to hold back the control board for cricket in India (Bcci) Instead of referring to his players as the “Indian Cricket Team”, rejected the confession as a “wasting” of judicial time.Over the boundaries with our YouTube channel. Subscribe now!Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Kumar Upadhyaya and Judge Tushar Rao Gedela reprimanded the petitioner, the Kansal Reepak’s lawyer, who argued that since BCCI was a private body and a government -acknowledged Sports Federation, he had no power to call “Indian forces.”The court quickly rejected this line of thought.“Are you saying the team doesn’t represent India? This team, which one will represent India, you say they don’t represent India? Isn’t that Indian team? If not the Indian team, please tell us why not the Indian team, “Judge Gedela said sharply.
Survey
Do you think BCCI should be allowed to refer to its players as ‘Indian team’?
Chief Justice Upadhyaya is the same, calling for a petition for trivial leisure use.“It’s a waste of court time and your own time. Tell us about the national team in any of the sports selected by government officials. Whether the Commonwealth Games, the Olympics, Hockey, Football, or Tennis – are they not representing India?”Kansal pills claim that BCCI, registered under the Tamil Nadu Registration Act, is not a statutory body or a “state” under Article 12 of the Constitution. It further claims that referring to the team as “Indian” or using the national flag violates the symbol and name (prevention of improper consumption), 1950 and the Indian flag code, 2002.However, the bench rejected this claim, observing that using a national flag or name for representatives in sports was not illegal.“If you want to present a flag in your home, are you forbidden to do so?” The court said.The judges also said that international sports bodies such as the International Olympic Committee (IOC) did not encourage government disruption in sports administration.Finally, the court rejected the pill, asserting that the Indian cricket team – regardless of BCCI’s personal status – represents the country in every sense.
